Different Views on Affirmative Action Essay

This paper will establish the different views on affirmative natural ch e precise(prenominal)enge. I will go oer both views of this issue, and will explain which side my personal views f altogether on. I will also discuss the pros and cons of affirmative fulfills, and the effects it has on the workplace. In its tumultuous 45-year history, affirmative action has been both praised and pilloried as an answer to racial in par. The affirmative action was first introduced by President Kennedy in 1961 as a method of redressing discrimination that had persisted in elicit of civil rights laws and constitutional guarantees (Brunner, 2008).Affirmative action is a highly controversial form _or_ system of government that is designed to suspensor minorities gain access to jobs and schools, etc. that they norm every last(predicate)y would non be able to enter into. Affirmative action gener all(prenominal)y means giving preferential treatment to minorities in admission to universities or em ployment in government and businesses. The policies were originally developed to correct decades of discrimination and to give disadvantaged minorities a boost. The diversity of our afoot(predicate) society as opposed to that of 50 years ago seem to indicate the programs have been a success.But now, more think the policies are no longer needed and that they lead to more conundrums than they bring (Messerh, 2008). The benefits were very great for minorities at one time. There was a time when minorities and women faced an uphill battle for equality in the workplace and in teaching method. The majority of masses believed that the better paying jobs should not unaccompanied go to white men but that they were the better qualified candidates. Keep in mind that all people have more shared than different characteristics, and no group is biologically superior to another.Neverthe little, racism, the persuasion that few racial groups are inherently inferior to others, has been common and is used to justify discrimination and equality (Lauer & Lauer, 2006, p. 225). This belief was spurred on by racism and sexism in the past. Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies required that mea convinced(predicate)s be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoyed the same opportunities for promotions, salary increases, occupational group advancement, school admissions, scholarships, and financial aid that had been the nearly xclusive province of whites.From the outset, affirmative action was envisioned as a temporary remedy that would end once there was a level playing field for all Americans (Brunner, 2008). I think that this policy was a good idea to begin with. There were many people back in the 50s who would go out of their way to make sure that blacks were not able to raise above their born into roles. At the time, a law like this was needed very bad.It was very important at that time in our history to include every one of a ll races and sexes. I believe that we have now reached a time in our history, where inclusion is at an all time high nationwide. This brings us to the problems that affirmative action has caused in our society. The biggest problem is reverse discrimination. Affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination. Affirmative action is designed to end discrimination and unfair treatment of employees/ educatees based on color, but it in effect does the opposite.Whites who work fleshyer and/or more qualified can be passed over strictly because they are white. Contrary to many stereotypes, many minorities fall into the middle or upper class, and many whites live in poverty. Unfortunately, the way things are set up now, a poverty-stricken white pupil who uses discipline and hard work to become the best he can be can be passed over by a rich nonage student who doesnt put in much effort at all (Messerh, 2008).Many people do not want to admit to this problem however, affirmative action has cr eated discrimination of the majority. If a person is a white male, they may actually be looked over for the simple fact that a university or company does not have enough minority employees. This is a discriminatory practice in the process. By the late 70s, however flaws in the policy began to show up amid its good intentions. Reverse discrimination became an issue, epitomized by the famous Blakke case in 1978.Allan Blakke, a white male, had been rejected two years by a medical school that had accepted less qualified applicants the school had a separate admissions policy for minorities and reserved 16 out of 100 places for minority students. The Supreme Court outlawed inflexible quota systems in affirmative action programs, which in this case had unfairly discriminated against a white applicant. In the same ruling, however, the Court upheld the legality of affirmative action per se (Brunner, 2008).I personally feel like affirmative action has also lowered the quality within the uni versities and in the workplace. Affirmative action lowers standards of accountability needed to push students or employees to perform better. If a minority student can get into Harvard with a 3. 2 grade-point average, why should she push herself to get a 4. 0? Although some students or employees are self-motivated, most people need an extra push or incentive to do their best, by setting lower standards for admission or hiring, we are lowering the level of accountability.We should reward hard work, discipline and achievement, we shouldnt reward a student simply because he or she is a certain(p) race, nor punished because he or she isnt (Messerh, 2008). All positions regardless of what it is, is better filled by modify it with the best and most qualified applicant. The best tool against discrimination and unfair hiring practices, would be to make sure all of our lower, middle, and high schools are up to par in order to create the best applicants overall.